Have you tried out NS-3?
This is what I got from http://www.nsnam.org/ official website of NS-3.
"ns-3 is intended as an eventual replacement for the popular ns-2 simulator. The project acronym “nsnam” derives historically from the concatenation of ns (network simulator) and nam (network animator). "
From user point of view, I noticed the main difference between NS-3 and NS-2 is the changes in language. Now NS-3 is using C++ and phyton, compared to NS-2 which used C and oTCL.
This means that for those who learn TCL for the sake of using NS-2 now need to learn other language for using NS-3.
Start from zero!
NS-3 is better than ns-2 in all terms including language.But i m not able to get GUI of any program i run on it.
ReplyDeleteNS-3 is better in all terms.But i m unable to get a GUI for any programs i run on it.
ReplyDelete